About PANACeA:
Background/Problem Statement:
eHealth
can be defined simply as the use of Information and Communication Technology
(ICT) in healthcare. eHealth solutions can be applied in many domains including
prevention and surveillance, administration, clinical settings, education and
health research. .The main uses of eHealth in developing countries have
been to improve access to healthcare services, and enhance the quality of care
by making patient data and other relevant information available to the
healthcare providers at the point of care. In the developing country context
there are specific challenges such as difficulties in communication between
healthcare providers working in remote areas and those working in tertiary care
hospitals, information transfers at different levels of care, and professional
isolation of healthcare providers working in rural areas. eHealth can provide a
medium to address these challenges by providing economically and
socio-culturally appropriate technology solutions available at different points
of care. The biggest problem at this time is the lack of scientific evidence to
convince the decision-makers at the institutional and government levels about
the benefits of eHealth in the local context, and to prove if one technology is
better than the other to address the same problem. PAN Asian Collaboration for
Evidence-based eHealth Adoption and Application (PANACeA) is an initiative to
generate evidence in the field of eHealth within the Asian context, by forming
a network of researchers from developing Asian countries.
Objectives/Research Questions:
The
primary aim of PANACeA is to create evidence for eHealth in the developing
countries of Asia. The specific objectives are to identify: 1) To support a set
of multi-country research activities to address the four core research
questions; 2) To create a theoretical model for evaluating good practice in
eHealth programs in Asia; 3) To build research capacity amongst Asian
researchers to evaluate and adopt appropriate eHealth technologies and
practices and influence policy and decision-makers; 4) To disseminate research
findings widely in the regional and international research communities.
PANACeA will find answers to the
following four core research questions: 1) Which eHealth applications and
practices have had the most beneficial outcomes on the health of individuals,
communities and the improvement of health systems? 2) What are the best ways
for ensuring that beneficial outcomes can reach the segment of the population
that still doesn’t have adequate access to health services? 3) What is the
potential of using new pervasive technologies such as mobile phones / PDAs as
tools to make the delivery of health services or information more effective? 4)
What types of technologies / applications are best suited to help prepare for,
or mitigate the effects of disasters, pandemics and emerging and re-emerging
diseases?
Methods:
Partners have been identified from
countries in Central, South, and South East Asia, who have worked together to
identify eight projects to generate evidence for the adoption of
technologically, economically and socio-culturally sound eHealth applications
in multiple countries. These projects will conduct a detailed needs and
situation analysis in the first six months (Phase I), followed by two years of
project implementation and research (Phase II). This will be followed by six
months of evaluation and reporting (Phase III). Three workshops will be
conducted during the course of the project to discuss project related issues
and plans. Projects will be supervised and mentored by the Advisory and
Monitoring team (AMT) comprising of Project manager from Aga Khan University
(AKU), project advisor from University of Calgary, and three other eHealth
experts from Asia. Regular communication, reporting and mentoring of the
projects will be done through online-discussion forums and visits by the
project manager, deputy project lead, and the members of AMT. Several
crosscutting issues have also been identified, which will be investigated in
Asian context, and will be included in each of the projects. Evidence generated
from these projects will be disseminated to policy makers and decision makers
at the institutional and government levels in all Asian countries.
Conclusion:
PANACeA offers a unique way of
developing evidence in a local context, yet involving a large number of
countries and developing new partnerships that may last beyond the duration of
this project.